I sincerely hope Arthur Brisbane’s question of whether or not the New York Times should challenge “facts” (his quotes, not mine) is an art project. If not, there’s no more damning an article written that explains everything that’s wrong with traditional media.

Vanity Fair created a great response that I will not endeavor to outdo.

Whose job is it to decide what words look strange and what words just look fancy? And at what point does an exotic extra consonant become distracting?